Rishabh Pant will never be a player who is easy to replace. Pant has brought attitude to India’s Test Team with his fearless batting style and electric glove work as a wicketkeeper. When it was announced that he was missing the final Test against England, due to a toe fracture, all eyes turned to who his replacement would be. Narayan Jagadeesan took the stage. Is he talented? For sure. Has he proven himself at the international level? Though the Tamil Nadu wicketkeeper-batter shines with impressive domestic stats, handing him the gloves at The Oval right now feels like setting him up for a tough challenge.
No International Experience + English Conditions = A Risky Mix
Jagadeesan’s domestic red-ball numbers are solid—over 47 averages in 52 first-class matches aren’t easy to ignore. But none of that experience comes in English conditions. He’s never played a Test for India, let alone in the high-pressure setting of a series decider overseas.
Batting in England, particularly against the Dukes ball, is a unique challenge. Just ask any experienced cricketer, and they will testify to how much late swing and seam can hurt you, especially if you’re from the subcontinent! Even the great MS Dhoni had many difficulties behind the stumps early in some tours to England due to the unpredictable swing and bounce.
Jagadeesan might be technically sound, but debuting in such an alien environment, in a must-win game, with no international exposure?
Better and More Ready Options Were Available
What makes this decision baffling is that India had alternatives, several that made much more sense given the context. KS Bharat has already played seven Tests and served as a wicketkeeper in the WTC Final at The Oval. He is currently playing club cricket in England—so clearly, he is in the zone for the conditions. With nearly 6,000 first-class runs and close to 400 dismissals, Bharat is not just experienced; he’s been through the ringer.
And lastly, there is Sanju Samson. Although he has never received a Test cap, he has been part of the Indian setup for several years and is used to dealing with the stresses of international cricket, in the white ball formats. He has just completed a successful Duleep Trophy campaign, which saw him finish with 196 runs over 4 innings, averaging 49. If India were willing to pick someone without Test experience, why not pick Samson, who at least has experience with the pace and pressures of high-level cricket?
India Missed a Trick by Not Strengthening Other Departments
Here’s where things get even more interesting: Did India even need a direct wicketkeeper replacement for Pant?
Behind the stumps, Jurel’s the headline act—Rahul’s the understudy who could steal the show in a heartbeat. So rather than adding a third keeper, India could’ve plugged other gaps—like the fast-bowling unit, which is suddenly looking a little thin.
Both Akash Deep and Arshdeep Singh have been going through niggles, and there’s speculation of Bumrah being rested. This would have been perfect for inviting someone like Mohammed Shami back, even if it was just for one game. He has experience, has done it in English conditions, and he could have been the X-factor to disrupt England’s top order.
Even someone like Sarfaraz Khan—fresh off a red-ball century that averages over 37 in Tests—could have been a vital piece to add to batting reserves.
To catch up on the most current news on all of your favorite thrilling cricket updates, visit Six6slive to access our comprehensive Latest News, insightful analysis, and updates. Connect with the action now to make sure you never miss out!